Temporal Entities
People send us a variety of photos. Recently we began to examine some photos that were sent to us some time ago.
We could label these images Wraith anomalies or Temporal Entities for the way they appear to warp space.
Mathematicians have proven the existence of at least 10 dimensions, but we shouldn’t worry as they are very tiny :o: I wonder what is living there?
The explanation for these anomalous images may be something far less grandiose then what we are proposing here, but this should prove to be more entertaining.
Mr. James Bratter contacted us recently and provided this next group of photographs. Mr. Bratter has been doing this type of research for over six years, after hearing about the method that John “Bro” Wilkie perfected in
the mid 90’s. This at first looks like a bird, a raven/crow perhaps diving towards the ground behind Mr. Bratter.
Mr. Bratter is seen here as he answers his cell phone. The battery of both the cell phone and camera went dead shortly after contact with this undiscribed “thing”. Here we see a different group of frames composite together. The movement is from the top of the photo towards the bottom. Note how in the middle frames the entity seems to warp the space around Mr. Bratter’s hand.
I have been more then hesitate to consider such outlandish ideas as to imply these images show “wraiths”, shadow men or interdimsional creatures that have only momentarily entered into our reality. To suggest such an idea would argue for insanity.
One of the reasons, one of the pleas to investigate this further comes from the number of sane eyewitness reports and the ever-growing number of photo’s and video footage that is being to submitted to the site.
There seems to be some energy involved with what ever is making these blurry, dark shadows appear on this footage.
Some of what Mr. Bratter has reflected to me in the past as to the nature of these creatures has simulaities to what others are now saying. So we are exploring many unconventional ideas in order to establish the facts.
A few months back this appeared while we were filming. This is a composite shot of two separate frames going from right to left. What ever passed in front of the camera was not seen by me (I was less then ten feet away) and appears to bend space/time.
There are some similarities here in this photo when compared to those that Mr. Bratter has taken of his Thunderbird entity.
One is that this image is all black or all white; the “thing” is extremely high contrast. There is also a noticeable bending or warping of the image itself. An internal defect within the camera one could argue.
The cameras used in these photographs are completely different models and several states apart. Something other then an internal defect is at work here. When we have photographic evidence paired up with physical testimony in the form of objects moving or batteries going dead. You may say, well it’s a coincident, and yes it may be.
Perhaps for some strange reason the universe decided to make Mr. Bratter’s batteries in both his cell phone and his newly charged camera to go dead at exactly the same time. The same time I wish to point out that the above photos appeared. Quite a coincident wouldn’t you agree? The video camera’s battery by the way was ruined and no longer takes a charge.
Then add in the growing, mounding pile of evidence, reports, photos and historical documents and you begin to run low on skepticism. These photos will appear in higher resolution on the flyingrods site at some point in the future if you are interested in greater clarity.
I know we have already sent this photo out but we want to once again point out the similarities in this Bee-Rod photo taken by Denny White to the same image captured by FOX 23 news in Albany New York. The FBI in the interest of national security confiscated the footage filmed by the News crew.
When do they plan on coming out and telling us what the rodsect image was?
Roger Harris was the first I believe to come out and “suggest” that the image captured by the news crew was in fact a blurred insect mistaken for a flying missile.
At that same time the infamous Jose Escamilla was smugly telling anyone who would listen that he was vindicated and this was a rod and now the FBI wanted it. Go out quickly and buy his videos before they are all gone. Well I digress.
We support Mr. Harris’s view on the identity of the footage now in the possession of the FBI. I personally am very interested as to how long the Federal Bureau of Investigation is going to sit on this goose egg.
If you go to Jose’s site www.roswellrods.com you might (how can you miss it?) see a banner asking you, pleading for you to flood FOX with e-mails requesting that they show Jose’s latest video. Might we suggest that you mail them and ask for a different viewpoint or at least a balanced argument.
Now for a photograph provided courtesy of Heide Fischer Wessels, a well-trained and capable photographer. We have shown some of Heide’s photos before and this is one that I don’t believe has yet been posted.
The serpentine anomalous image is quite clear and well defined in this photo.
A number of possible explanations exist for something of this nature such as something passed in front of the camera and simply was blurred by the shutter speed. I wonder, what could pass in front of the camera to produce such an image.
Heide also provide us with a photo of this rock without an entity in the frame. Same settings I would assume yet complete different results. If the camera was the same then something external is responsible for this image.
Perhaps something as strange as temporal entities, wraith like shadow creatures or an unknown energy.
Heide reported that she seems to capture a number of images of this nature implying at least that some of these anomalous events may be triggered by certain people or some other trigger that brings these “things” into such a state as to allow them to be recorded by digital cameras and video.
It may be that the act of ‘looking’ may be all that is needed to invite such events to play out in your presence.
The act of photographing allows the individual to record events that may not be visible or recognizable by the naked eye due to a number of reasons. It could be that they are beyond the visible spectrum or happening at such a speed as to be invisible to the eyes of humans.
Mr. John Doucette our neighbor to the north in Canada, was kind enough to share this photo with us as well as to provide us with more information by completing the flying rods reporting form.
Several aspects of this photograph demand closer scrutiny.
First is the extreme depth of field suggesting a tight f-stop and resulting in both the kelp in the foreground and the distance spruce trees to be in focus. The original version provided to us by Mr.Doucette is considerably larger then what we see here.
Here we provide an enlarged close-up and you can see the light reflecting off the top left side of the object, as well as being able to view some sort of appendages, fins or wings attached to the sides.
The Second interesting fact is that the surf is in focus as well, implying a fast shutter speed.
Then we have to take into account the reported temp of 30 degrees along with a stiff breeze which pretty much elimates insects as being responable for these two anomalous images.
High shutter speed, cold blustery day, and extreme clarity all point to something mysterious being responsible for these images.
Take note in the enlarged cropped image that these entities appear to have appendages at both the front and the rear of their bodies. Unlike any birds we are familiar with and thus we must label them as unknowns.
This photo with trees was taken on November 24th 2002 when the outside temperature here in Maine was a balmy 34 degrees with humidity of 24%. About two inches of snow lay on the ground and with the sky crystal clear, no visible insects could be seen. You can see a crust of snow visible at the bottom of this shot.
Among other anomalous images seen that day this was one of the few that passed in front of and behind a tree of know size and distance from the camera.
This allows us to make a fairly accurate estimation of the size of the object. Close guess gives us about 4 inches long and 2 ½ high. You can see the branch though the object and if you compare a shot of the branch without the Entity in front of it, you can see a distortion of the branch has occurred when the “object” is in front of the branch.
Implying perhaps that light was bent when it passed though the object.
Here with this comparison you can see a clear distortion in the photo with the object.
The wind on the day these photos were taken was from right to left, yet we see many of these long streaks traveling into the wind. Suggesting to me that what ever they are, they are under their own power.
Seems extremely unlikely that these are insects, but as to what they are, it is also difficult to say.
We received a most interesting letter from a Murray Davies in New Zealand a while back and wanted to share with you what he told us.
This report is fascinating for a variety of reasons. First off a visual sighting of an air dwelling “Jellyfish” is an extremely rare event. Yes you heard right an air dwelling Jellyfish. We will let Mr. Davies words speak for him and have included here potions of the reporting form he kindly filled out.
What time of the year was your sighting, year, month and day, time of day?
“February 1992, about 2.00pm. Not sure what day.”
What is your best estimate of the object’s size, and
What are you basing your estimate on?
“About 15 - 20 feet high, 10 feet across. Viewed from several
angles against a range of hills less than half a mile away.”
How long did you maintain visible contact with object?
“About five minutes, then started walking backwards to get binoculars and lost sight of it. It was hard to see as it was almost transparent”
If more then one object, how did they relate to each other?
“Only saw one object.”
What was the temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction?
“Very hot, probably 30 degrees Celsius plus, medium humidity, light breeze from south which was interesting because object was moving towards south - into the wind.”
Where did the sighting occur?
“Four and a half miles south of Taneatua, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand.”
How fast would you estimate the object/objects were traveling?
“Five miles per hour.”
What color was the object?
“Almost transparent.”
How far away was the object?
“100 - 150 yards, about 100 feet up.”
Describe the shape of the object?
“Like a jelly fish or a very deflated weather balloon with short tentacles? Underneath. The sides flapped slowly (1 - 2 seconds per beat) like a vertical manta ray.”
What type of vegetation, types of trees, shrubs, grasses etc were present in the area of the sighting?
“Dairy farming area. Lots of grassland, hills covered in native bush and a swamp area (10 acres) with willow trees 60 -70 feet high.”
Were you making, or did you hear any noises prior to or during the sighting, please describe?
“Was building a hay-barn at the time so apart from some hammering and hand-sawing everything was pretty quiet.”
Please add as many other details as you can remember or feel could be important.
“Weather was real fine, possibly not a cloud in the sky and really hot.”
Thank you for your time completely this form, and any comments, thoughts or feedback, feel free to put here.
“About 1958 (rough guess) myself and a friend were making a hut in the swamp when we heard this loud humming like a huge wasp nest. Scared us pretty good and we headed home as fast as we could. My friend doesn't remember the incident. The real strange thing is that all the animals for 2-3 miles around were spooked and ran around their paddocks for an hour or so. Told the adults when we got home and the next day a group of us went down to the swamp to have a look. There was an area about 1/4 acre of low rushes where we thought something could have landed if it had been a UFO but we found nothing. The cows and horses thought something was going on though. Hope this is of some help to you.”
Murray Davies.
Well I think you will agree that this is a most remarkable account. People do see these strange floating Jellyfish shape creatures once in a great while.
They almost always describe them in similar terms as we see here and the real question is where do these things live and how many of them are there?
Do they live here on planet earth and if so is the changing air quality (pollution) harming these translucent critters?
In years past it was common to find “Star Jelly” along side meteorites remains. The theory to explain this was that the earth was covered in a gelatinous cloud of some type completely encapsulated the earth.
If the earth was swarming with air dwelling jellyfish then this theory may have not been too far off from the truth.
A falling meteorite would had to have fallen though these schools of Jellyfish and may have brought some of this material to earth with it.
These reports are too wide spread and too consistence to ignore and there really are only two explanations, both of which stretch the ream of possibilities. Until next time.
Comments or sightings send to:
Rainbowrods@sightingcentral.com
Send complaints to:(Someone else)